|
The
most important part of a solar charger is the solar cell itself.
This overview is meant to provide the general background
information on solar technology making you understand more about
several types of solar cells available with all their inherent
advantages and disadvantages.
|
|

»enlarge
|
Monocrystalline
solar cells (c-Si)
Silicon
wafers sliced from a silicon ingot provide a high degree of energy
efficiency (20%) at full sun, but little performance in overcast
conditions. Monocrystalline solar cells have to face significant
performance losses (- 10%) due to intense heat caused by the sun
shining onto the cell. They are little (or not) tolerant to
shading conditions at all. Still being expensive, they’re not
bendable – thus highly fragile. UV-resistant.
|
|
|
Polycrystalline
solar cells
Polycrystalline
silicon solar cells consist of small silicon crystals being melted
together. You can reconize them by a visible grain, which looks
like the typical “metal flake effect”. They provide an average
degree of energy efficiency (15%) at full sun and a bad
performance when the sky is overcast. Great performance losses
(15-20%) due to intense heat. They are little or not tolerant to
shading conditions, but inexpensive. Not bendable, thus highly
fragile and not UV-resistant unless placed under glass. Low-end
solar cells with a PET-sealing tend to oxidize and quickly lose
their performance.
|
»enlarge
|
|
|

»enlarge
|
Thin
film solar cells (CIS, CIGS)
Polymer
films which were vapour-coated by
copper-indium-gallium-di-selenide or copper-indium-di-sulfide.
Average degree of energy efficiency of 12% at full sun,
acceptable efficiency under a cover of clouds. Minor performance
losses (- 5%) due to intense heat. They can’t be turned off.
These cells are very expensive as well as UV-resistant, highly
bendable and lightweight.
|
|
|
Dye-sensitized
solar cells (Grätzel)
The
dye-sensitized solar cell is a kind of thin-film cell based on the
photoelectrochemical system and consists of organic dyes printed
onto polymer foil. Low efficiency level (10%) at full sun,
virtually no performance under a cloudy sky. Minor performance
losses due to intense heat, but barely or not at all tolerant to
shadings. They are cheap, bendable and lightweight. The greatest
disadvantage of dye-sensitized solar cells is their limited
lifespan.
|

»enlarge
|
|
|

»enlarge
|
Multijunction
solar cells (Ga As)
Multijunction
solar cells (Triple Cell / Triple Junction) as used for aerospace.
Three solar cells monolithically stacked on top of each other are
sensitive to a wide range of a light spectrum (red-blue-green)
thus providing the currently highest level of efficiency (30%) at
full sun. The industry-leading multijunction solar cells are
highly tolerant to shadowing and turn out to be the best
performers under a dark sky. They are very expensive, but bendable,
lightweight and resistant to UV radiation. It’s not surprising
that they virtually have no performance losses (only -3%) due to
intense heat.
More
information on solar cells:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell
»to
the SwissSolarCard shop
»more
information on the Triple Junction solar cell
|
|
|
Electrical
efficiency of a solar cell: what does that mean?
The
electrical efficiency rate of a solar cell and the resulting
wattage or power rate are most commonly derived from standard test
conditions.
The measurement is performed with a 25°C warm solar panel and a
solar irradiance of 1000 watts per square meter of the panel
surface, which corresponds to an efficiency of 100%.
Thus an efficiency of 15% means that the solar panel is capable of
converting 15% of the current solar radiation into electric power.
In accordance with that, the solar module does have a wattage
rating of 150 watt per square meter of its surface.
Please note: in reality the solar panels tend to heat up to much
higher temperatures then 25°C and the irradiation of 1000W/m2 is
only reached in the sunniest regions of the globe near the equator.
That’s why you get the best results by using a solar panel
offering the highest level of efficiency AND lowest losses of
power due to heating.
|

»enlarge
|
|
|

»enlarge
|
The
bottom line is that rigid and brittle solar cells may belong on
top of the roof, but definitely not onto a backpack.
While
traveling you will hardly ever find optimum conditions, so that it
will certainly pay off to invest in flexible state-of-the-art
solar chargers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|